+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 21.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.2% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DROP (91.6%), CLUEWSC (90.9%), MATH-500 (90.2%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (66.5%), MMLU (60.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (59.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:39.5%(+21.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:17.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:39.5%(+21.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:17.9%
Providers:0