+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:70.5%(+27.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:42.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:70.5%(+27.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:42.6%
Providers:0