+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 32.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:88.7%(+32.2%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:56.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:88.7%(+32.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:56.5%
Providers:0