+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 8.5% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $0.97 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
5 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.10
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:80.2%(+8.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:71.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:80.2%(+8.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:71.8%
Providers:9