+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.2% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DROP (91.6%), CLUEWSC (90.9%), MATH-500 (90.2%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:44.8%(+19.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:24.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:44.8%(+19.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:24.9%
Providers:0