+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 30.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 729.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $0.90 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:79.3%(+30.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:48.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:79.3%(+30.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:48.5%
Providers:1