Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 28.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 786.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $0.77 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
5 months newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek-V3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

DeepSeek-V3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek-V3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek-V3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite