+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:29.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:34.6%(+5.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:29.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:34.6%(+5.3%)
Providers:0