+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 39.7% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $0.97 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:77.1%(+39.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:37.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:77.1%(+39.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:37.4%
Providers:2