+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 54.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $1.21 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
2 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($1.21 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:77.1%(+54.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:22.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:77.1%(+54.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:22.8%
Providers:1