+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 44.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:66.2%(+44.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:21.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:66.2%(+44.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:21.3%
Providers:0