+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 44.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:66.2%(+44.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:21.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:66.2%(+44.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:21.3%
Providers:0