+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 41.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 263.7K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $58.73 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
5 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00($58.73 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:66.2%(+41.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:24.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:66.2%(+41.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:24.8%
Providers:1