+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 41.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:66.2%(+41.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:24.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:66.2%(+41.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:24.8%
Providers:0