+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 1.3% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:40.0%(+1.3%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:38.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:40.0%(+1.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:38.7%
Providers:0