+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GLM-4.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 131.1K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $1.53 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
7 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00($1.53 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2