Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 25.1% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $0.73 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita
GPT OSS 120B
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPT OSS 120B
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval