+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 54.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 61.7K more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00($0.43 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:58.7%(+54.0%)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:4.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:58.7%(+54.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:4.7%
Providers:1