+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
7 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:65.0%(+6.7%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:58.4%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Coding66.0%(+0.2%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:65.0%(+6.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:58.4%
Providers:0