Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.87 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek-V3.1
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
DeepSeek-V3.1
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-V3.1
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-V3.1
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together