+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.87 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
1 month newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.87 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:79.3%(+19.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:59.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:79.3%(+19.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:59.7%
Providers:9