+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:40.6%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:17.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:40.6%(+22.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:17.8%
Providers:0