+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 24.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $1.09 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
3 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($1.09 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:77.3%(+24.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:53.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:77.3%(+24.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:53.1%
Providers:4