+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 30B A3B. Qwen3 30B A3B is $0.87 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3 30B A3B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
3 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.87 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:61.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:69.9%(+8.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:61.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:69.9%(+8.1%)
Providers:3