+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 10.9% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $0.87 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
3 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.87 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:60.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:71.5%(+10.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:60.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:71.5%(+10.9%)
Providers:3