+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Devstral Small 1.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. Devstral Small 1.1 offers 26.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
2 months newer
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.28 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:67.8%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Average Score:53.6%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Coding67.8%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Coding53.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:67.8%(+14.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:1