+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 33.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 827.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.31 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:82.5%(+33.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:48.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:82.5%(+33.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:48.5%
Providers:1