+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
8 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:79.9%(+5.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:79.9%(+5.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%
Providers:0