Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 884.7K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $2.12 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Novita
ZeroEval

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval