+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (97.1%), AIME 2025 (89.3%), MMLU-Pro (85.0%). It supports a 229K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:30.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:36.9%(+6.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:30.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:36.9%(+6.0%)
Providers:0