+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 50.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 32.8K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Gemma 3 12B is $0.53 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
6 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.53 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:84.0%(+50.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:33.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:84.0%(+50.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:33.1%
Providers:1