+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 46.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 32.8K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
6 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.38 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:84.0%(+46.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:37.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:84.0%(+46.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:37.4%
Providers:2