+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 5.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 32.8K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Both models have similar pricing. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
1 month newer
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45($0.14 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:56.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:62.2%(+5.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:56.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:62.2%(+5.4%)
Providers:5