+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 21.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 32.8K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $2.19 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
2 months newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41($2.19 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:70.5%(+21.4%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:49.1%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Coding67.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Coding71.6%(+3.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:70.5%(+21.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:49.1%
Providers:1