+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct offers 26.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
9 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.28 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:82.5%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:59.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:82.5%(+22.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:59.7%
Providers:9