+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 26.6% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp offers 165.4K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
8 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($0.47 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:82.5%(+26.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:55.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:82.5%(+26.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:55.8%
Providers:2