+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads with 45.5% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:87.3%(+45.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:87.3%(+45.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:0