+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 17.0% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 70.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $74.32 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (97.1%), AIME 2025 (89.3%), MMLU-Pro (85.0%). It supports a 229K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input:$0.27
Output:$0.41($74.32 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Average Score:29.9%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:46.9%(+17.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Avg Score:29.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:46.9%(+17.0%)
Providers:2