+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Small leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Small is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny was developed as an ultra-efficient vision-language model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to enable multimodal AI on edge devices and mobile applications, it distills vision-language capabilities into a minimal footprint for widespread accessibility.
Launched on the same date
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:69.6%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:63.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:69.6%(+6.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:0