+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 27.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
1 month newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:75.4%(+27.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:75.4%(+27.4%)
Providers:0