+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:72.9%(+24.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:72.9%(+24.9%)
Providers:1