+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Small leads with 7.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Small is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:83.2%(+7.3%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:75.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:83.2%(+7.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:75.9%
Providers:1