+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Small leads with 6.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Small is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:83.2%(+6.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:77.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:83.2%(+6.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:77.0%
Providers:2