+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Small leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Small is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:83.2%(+17.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:65.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:83.2%(+17.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:65.4%
Providers:1