+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 14.1% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Small supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (92.3%), ChartQA (84.5%), OCRBench (83.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:30.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:44.5%(+14.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:30.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:44.5%(+14.1%)
Providers:8