+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 20.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Small supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Small was created as a compact vision-language variant, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications with limited computational resources. Built to provide visual and textual understanding in a more efficient package, it serves use cases requiring practical deployment of vision-language AI.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
4 days newer
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:54.4%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:74.7%(+20.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:54.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:74.7%(+20.4%)
Providers:2