+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Small vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Small leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Small supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Small is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (92.3%), ChartQA (84.5%), OCRBench (83.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 days newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
DeepSeek VL2 Small
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Average Score:36.1%(+4.3%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:31.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Small
Avg Score:36.1%(+4.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:31.8%
Providers:1