+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny was developed as an ultra-efficient vision-language model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to enable multimodal AI on edge devices and mobile applications, it distills vision-language capabilities into a minimal footprint for widespread accessibility.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
9 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:47.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:54.2%(+7.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:47.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:54.2%(+7.0%)
Providers:1