+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 39.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny was developed as an ultra-efficient vision-language model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to enable multimodal AI on edge devices and mobile applications, it distills vision-language capabilities into a minimal footprint for widespread accessibility.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
5 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:40.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:79.7%(+39.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:40.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:79.7%(+39.0%)
Providers:2