+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 13.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:34.0%(+13.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:20.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:34.0%(+13.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:20.4%
Providers:1