+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:29.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:36.9%(+7.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:29.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:36.9%(+7.4%)
Providers:0